Skip to page content
Independent · Carrier-neutral education
Structured Installment Sale Resource Center
For sellers and the professionals beside them
Authorities 8

Master Authority Maps

Master maps of the authority chain underlying the Structured Installment Sale, by topic and by source.

Reading level
Choose the level of detail.

Content reviewed October 17, 2026 · Educational reference

Everything above, mapped back to the three pillars.

8.1 · By pillar — which authority does what

PillarCore authoritiesSupporting authorities
Qualifies as installment sale§453(a)–(c); §453(f)(3); Reg. §15a.453-1, incl. (b)(3) (definition of "payment")Pub. 537; Form 6252; §1274/§483 (interest); §453(i), §1245/§1250 (recapture limits); Holmes (1970) (third-party note = payment)
Eligibility screens / limits§453(e), §453(g), §453(k), §453(l); §453A§1239, §267(b), §318; §6621; TAM 9853002
Obligor substitution is not a disposition§453B; Rev. Rul. 75-457; Rev. Rul. 82-122; CunninghamRev. Rul. 74-157, 68-419; GCM 36299; PLR 201248008, 201144005; T.D. 8675; (outer limit: Burrell Groves)
No constructive receiptReg. §1.451-2; Oden; WilliamsPub. 537 escrow rules; §130/§72 architecture (annuity owned by assignment company)
Assignment mechanics§130 (why NQA is required); §72(u)(3)§104(a); NQA PLR line
Distinguishing the abusive cousinREG-109348-22; §7701(o); §6011/§6111/§6112ECC 202118016; DOJ 2025 complaint (United States v. Crow, D. Idaho No. 1:25-cv-00177); Dirty Dozen (earlier lists, e.g., IR-2021-144; not on the 2026 list, IR-2026-30)

8.2 · The obligor-substitution authority chain (chronological)

AuthorityYearHolding
Cunningham v. Commissioner, 44 T.C. 103 (acq.)1965New-obligor assumption is not a disposition; focus on the seller's unchanged rights
Rev. Rul. 74-1571974Multiple notes substituted for one — not a disposition
Rev. Rul. 75-4571975Obligor substitution, same terms — not a disposition
Rev. Rul. 82-1221982Obligor substitution + rate change — not a disposition
T.D. 8675 preamble, 61 Fed. Reg. 329261996§453B standard (not §1001) governs
PLR 2011440052011Price + rate + payment-date changes — not a disposition
PLR 2012480082012Maturity deferral + obligor substitution + rate change — not a disposition

8.3 · The four conditions a compliant SIS must satisfy

The seller's payment rights are not materially altered — same schedule and amounts (Rev. Rul. 75-457/82-122; Cunningham; outer limit Burrell Groves).

The seller does not constructively receive the proceeds — no unfettered access to escrow or the annuity (Reg. §1.451-2; Oden; Williams).

The seller’s rights in the funding asset must be reviewed separately from the contractual installment receivable; assignment-company ownership does not itself establish a §72(u) exception or resolve every economic-benefit question.

The non-qualified assignment is executed at or before closing — before any right to a lump sum vests (§453; constructive-receipt doctrine).

A note on the weight of authority

  • Statutes and regulations: apply the Internal Revenue Code and applicable valid Treasury Regulations, including effective dates, exceptions, and relevant judicial interpretations.
  • Published IRS positions: revenue rulings state the IRS’s application of law to their facts and can be relied on in appropriate circumstances. IRS acquiescence indicates its response to a decision; neither is a substitute for comparing material facts.
  • Judicial precedent: Tax Court and appellate decisions carry weight according to jurisdiction, precedential status, and subsequent treatment. A case’s holding should be distinguished from an analogy to an SIS.
  • Nonprecedential IRS materials: PLRs, TAMs, and Chief Counsel Advice may not be used or cited as precedent under §6110(k)(3). Internal memoranda can illuminate reasoning but do not supply a general ruling for other taxpayers.
  • Proposed rules: distinguish a proposal from an effective final rule. REG-109348-22’s scope and effective date must be verified; the absence of a final designation does not resolve substantive tax validity or all other reporting categories.
The catalog provides a chain of authority on installment obligations, substitutions, and receipt, with different facts and different precedential weight. Those sources should be applied issue by issue to the actual SIS. Absence of a ruling declaring a product abusive is not affirmative approval, and an arrangement’s tax treatment cannot be established solely by contrasting it with a monetized sale. Keep the supporting analysis, distinguishable authority, and contract-specific limitations together.

Sources: IRC §453 — installment method; Treas. Reg. §15a.453-1; IRC §1274 — certain debt issued for property; IRC §483 — unstated interest; IRC §1272 — original issue discount; IRC §453B — dispositions of obligations; T.D. 8675 — debt modifications, IRS Bulletin 1996-29; IRC §453A — interest and pledges; IRC §691 — income in respect of a decedent; IRC §1014 — inherited basis and IRD exception; IRC §72 — annuity taxation; NAIC — Risk-Based Capital for Insurers Model Act; NOLHGA — product coverage questions.

↑ Back to top

Open in the complete Knowledgebase · Read all 37 sections in one scroll